Getting My case law on disciplinary proceedings To Work
Getting My case law on disciplinary proceedings To Work
Blog Article
Google Scholar – an unlimited database of state and federal case regulation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
How much sway case regulation holds may vary by jurisdiction, and by the precise circumstances on the current case. To take a look at this concept, consider the following case law definition.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have read the uncovered counsel to the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments because the issues from the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) from the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession with the subjected premises on the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs for being decided because of the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer within the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has got to see this aspect for interim custody of the topic premises In case the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
Typically, the burden rests with litigants to appeal rulings (such as those in apparent violation of proven case law) to your higher courts. If a judge acts against precedent, as well as the case just isn't appealed, the decision will stand.
This Court could interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the summary or finding is which include no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may well interfere with the conclusion or perhaps the finding and mold the relief to really make it correct to your facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority would be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. About the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified via the decision from the Supreme Court during the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
Lots of the volumes (together with more recent volumes than the library's holdings) are also accessible online through the Caselaw Access Project.
116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice with the Peace u/s 22-A is not obliged to afford a chance of hearing towards the accused party; nor obliged to essentially or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is required to look at all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal legislation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a number of the relevant factors. Read more
The court system is then tasked with interpreting the regulation when it is unclear the way it relates to any presented situation, typically rendering judgments based within the intent of lawmakers along with the circumstances in the case at hand. Such decisions become a guide for future similar cases.
In some jurisdictions, case law can be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family regulation.
500,000/- (Rupees 5 hundred thousand only) Just about every along with the same shall be stored while in the police station to the effect that no harm shall be caused towards the petitioners. five. In view of the above, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of Read more
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance on the respondents that pensionary benefits may very well be withheld on account on the allegations leveled against the petitioner, within our view, section twenty of the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does offer for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced. These include if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence read more during their service, their pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension might be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set from the government.
Problems or Errors In the event you encounter any technical problems with this website (like a undesirable link or even a portion of an opinion lacking), please notify the eService Centre.
Previous 4 tax years interpreted. It's not at all from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, it is also a properly-recognized proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is subject on the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.